The Ninth Crusade
The Origins of the
Judaic/Zionist War in the Middle East and of America s War on Terrorism
Henry H. Lindner, MD
The Ninth Crusade of Western Christendom to invade, occupy, and control
Palestine led to the creation of a Jewish race-religion state in Palestine. It
was founded by the expulsion of 750,000 non-Jews in 1947-48. Israel has
continued to talk about a two-state solution while feverishly building
settlements in order to make such a solution impossible. It has continued to
deny to non-Jewish Palestinians their right to return to their homes, their
right to live in peace, their right to just compensation, and their right
to have the most basic freedoms. The establishment of Israel has placed all
Jews in a permanent state of open warfare with the rest of mankind. To attempt
to win this war, Jews and Christians carried out 9/11 to manipulate the United
States into direct military involvement to destroy all those who oppose the
state of Israel. This has resulted in the final destruction of the United
States moral standing abroad and individual rights at home.
The study of history is the study of how we got here. Nothing in
the modern world can be understood without a full knowledge of the evolution of
causes and effects that produced it. If you want to understand what is
happening, you must study history. Let us consider the situation of the people
of the Middle East: Muslim, Christian, and Jew. The number of crusades launched
by the Christian West to conquer the Holy Land, starting in 1095 AD, is
numbered from 8 up to 13 or more. I prefer to count only the 8 significant
crusades. I therefore
choose to call this current crusade the Ninth Crusade. Like all the
others, it was motivated by religion and by greed.
The Islamic world was, from the 10th to the 17th
centuries, far ahead of the Western Christian world in every important way. The
last great Islamic empire was the Turkish Ottoman Empire. It included all the
Arab countries and extended into Greece and the Balkans. Western countries took
advantage of the weakening of the Turkish Empire to invade and control various
parts. Arabs, who had been under Turkish domination for centuries, now came
under Western domination. By the end of the 19th century, the
Western control of the Middle East was well underway. This aggression was,
of course, a crime against the people of the region, but back then it did not
need to be rationalized as a War against Terrorism . Napoleon invaded Egypt in
1798, Britain took over Egypt from France in 1882. France conquered Algeria in
1830, Britain took Aden in 1839. Tunisia was occupied in 1881, the Sudan in 1889,
and Libya and Morocco in 1912. In 1915, the Anglo-French Sykes-Picot Agreement
divided the remaining territories of the moribund Ottoman Empire between France
and England, in anticipation of victory in the First World War. The Arab
regions were promised independence and self-government with the Turkish empire
s collapse after WWI.
In the McMahon correspondence, the British promised independence to the
Arab-speaking people of the eastern Mediterranean, including the Palestinians,
if they would rebel against the Turkish Empire that was then allied with
Germany (Remember Lawrence of Arabia). President Woodrow Wilson also
declared that WWI was fought to make the world safe for democracy . The 12th
of his Fourteen Principles for the post-war world was: The Turkish
portions of the present Ottoman Empire should be assured a secure sovereignty,
but the other nationalities which are now under
Turkish rule (e.g. Arabs) should be
assured an undoubted security of life and an absolutely unmolested opportunity
of autonomous development, Wilson also stated, on July
4, 1918, that one of the four great ends for which the associated peoples of
the world were fighting was The settlement of every
question, whether of territory...or of political relationship, upon the basis of
the free acceptance of that settlement by the people immediately concerned, and
not on upon the basis of the material interest or advantage of any other nation
or people which may desire a different settlement for their own exterior
influence or mastery.
Had the
Western world adhered to McMahon s promise and to Wilson s admirable program,
the Ninth Crusade against the Arab/Muslim would have ended, and nothing
in the Middle East would be like it is today. The Arabic-speaking peoples of the
region would have decided what states to create and who would rule them. They
would have entered the world community as free nations, and would have been
able to follow their own process of democratization, modernization, and
secularization as all unassailed nations do. However, Wilson failed to force
his program on the war-mongering colonialists of Britain and France. They
insisted upon humiliating and ruinous terms for the German people who had
fought them to a draw before the US intervened in WW1, thus setting the stage
for the rise of Hitler and a greater war. They also insisted on occupying the
Arab Middle East. Think about it. Instead of the democracy and self-rule that they
were promised, the region got military occupation by the Western powers. France took
control of what became Lebanon and Syria, and Britain occupied what became
Iraq, Jordan, and Palestine. (Shamed by this British betrayal of all he had
worked for, Lawrence returned his medals to the British government).
Why weren
t the people of the region simply granted the independence they were promised?
Why did the Western powers have to carve up the Arab world and place it under
their domination? Certainly they sought their own advantages and wanted to
control the Middle East just as they had tried to do in previous Crusades just
a few hundred years before. Certainly they wanted more control over oil in some
of those countries. The most important reason however, as in the earlier
Crusades, was religious the desire to control the Holy Land. In this case, they
had a definite plan they wanted to establish a permanent Jewish state in Palestine. Zionism, the belief
that Jews (those who believed in or identified with the religion--Judaism)
could not and should not live happily in the various countries where they were
born, but should return to Palestine as per their religion
and re-create a Jewish state, had arisen among some East European Jews in the
late nineteenth century. It was a tribalistic, racist doctrine akin to Hitler s
belief the Germany should be an Aryan nation free of Jews, gypsies, and slavs.
Most Jews in the world at the time, including those in Palestine and America,
wanted nothing to do with this modern Zionism because they could anticipate the
immense antipathy it would create between Jew and gentile and that it would
feed both Jewish extremism and opposition to Jews and Judaism as it has done.
Britain,
anxious to gain whatever advantage it could in the war against Germany, and
under pressure from Zionist Jews with money and influence (e.g. the
Rothschilds), committed itself, in the Balfour
Declaration of 1917, to the establishment, in Palestine, of a national
home for the Jewish people it being clearly understood that nothing shall be
done which should prejudice the civil and religious rights of Christians and
all other non-Jewish communities in Palestine. America joined this Crusade
after the end of Wilson s administration with the resolution adopted by the
United States Congress on June 30, 1922 repeating the exact wording of the
Balfour declaration. There was a very simple problem with the British-American
plan. The Jews were a small minority among the 700,000 Christians and Muslims
in Palestine and owned only 3% of the land. There was no way that a Jewish
state could be established there if Britain and America s other promises and
principles were to be upheld. So the promises and the principles went out the
window in the Crusaders zeal to control the Holy Land and the entire Middle
East.
The
British and French divided and ruled the Arab-speaking world. Greater
Syria, including Lebanon, Palestine, Jordan, and part of Iraq, was arbitrarily
divided into little countries each controlled under a British or French
mandate. They imported and installed rulers from the Hashemite kingdom of
Mecca, thinking that since they were supposed descendants of Mohammed, they
would have some authority even though chosen by the Western overlords. The
French and British ruthlessly suppressed any defiance. The occupation and
bombing of Iraq by the British was particularly brutal and the British relied on
aerial bombardment to destroy entire villages, without regard then, as
today for the deaths of sand monkey civilians.
From that
time until now, these states have been creatures of the West and have had the
rulers that the West wanted or allowed, and in some cases, like Iran, rulers
that arose due to rebellion against the rulers imposed by the West. Britain s
Mandate over Palestine provided the necessary cover for the mass importation of
Jews and their acquisition of land and arms all against the wishes of the
population of Palestine and the surrounding countries. Knowing full well that
the Zionist Jews meant to dispossess and control them, the Palestinian people
revolted at times, but were suppressed by British soldiers and Zionist
irregulars. President Wilson s King-Crane commission, in 1919, reported that,
in its meetings with Jewish representatives, the Zionists looked forward to a
practically complete dispossession of the present non-Jewish inhabitants of Palestine. The commission stated that the claim, often submitted by Zionist
representatives, that they have a right to Palestine based on an occupation of
two thousand years ago, can hardly be considered.
In the
1930s, the British allowed a mass immigration of Jews and there were many
terrorist attacks against non-Jews by armed Jewish gangs. In 1934, the British
proposed that Palestine be ruled by a legislative council of 28 members on
which the Arabs (both Christian and Muslim) would have fourteen seats and the
Jews eight. The Arabs were willing to consider it, but the Jews and the British
House of Commons rejected it, and this sparked off the Arab rebellion of 1936.
The British, having some conscience, decided in 1939 that they had done enough
to establish the Jewish national home and started to curb Jewish
immigration. Enraged, Zionist terrorists proceeded to attack and kill
British soldiers and officials (e.g. bombing the King David Hotel) so that the
British began to withdraw and turned the problem over to the United Nations. At
the opening of the London Conference on January 27, 1947, a statement was read
by Jamal El-Husseini, vice-chairman of the Arab Higher Committee. It
deserves to be quoted at length as a snapshot of this momentous time and as evidence
that the Arab people knew then, as they know now, what was being done to them,
and why:
"During the last 25 years, however, Palestine had been denied the
right to self-government, in violation of those rights and pledges as well as
the covenant of the League of Nations. An autocratic administration was set up
with the primary aim of assisting the Jews in their invasion of Palestine. The
Balfour Declaration on which this policy was based was a vague and one-sided
encouragement made by Great Britain to alien Jews in the absence and complete
ignorance of the Arab owners of the country.
Since 1918 the Jewish elements in Palestine had increased by enforced
migration from 7 per cent to 33 per cent of the entire population...
During this period Jewish political claims had inflated from a
modest spiritual home to the establishment of a Jewish state which
they sought to enforce by the present campaign of terrorism. This had
driven the Arabs to the point of exasperation, for they beheld that all the
apprehensions they had expressed 25 years ago were being rapidly fulfilled.
Certain quarters had proposed that justice might be done if the country
were partitioned between Arabs and Jews. The Arabs believed that such a
proposal was an easy pretext for evading the difficulties of a problem
that had been created by a gross injustice. The creation of an
alien Jewish state in Palestine would mean a running sore that would
undoubtedly become a permanent source of trouble in the Middle East,
and would mean the destruction of Arab continuity and territorial
sovereignty."
(As quoted in The
Palestine Diary by Robert John and Sami Hadawi (New World Press, NY, 1970)
Here
in 2013, this running sore is getting ever more inflamed for the simple reason
that radical Zionist Jews and Christians insist on expanding the Jewish state
into the West Bank and eventually expanding the religious/race-based state of
Israel to include all of mandatory Palestine and to expel all non-Jews, just as
prescribed by the Jewish
Scriptures. Jews are simply following their religion, and
Western Christians, with half of their Bible being the Jewish scriptures, are
forced to support them.
Under
pressure from the US, the UN, in 1948, decided to partition Palestine and
create the new Jewish state of Israel. Jews, who by then owned only 7%
of Palestine, were given 55% of the land, a straightforward act of theft. But
the Zionists wanted more land and less Palestinians. They planned and executed
a vast ethnic cleansing operation that led to the 1947-49 war. The war was
started by the Zionists. The surrounding
Arab states attacked only after
the Zionists had forced over 300,000 people from their homes. Not only the
Arab states, but the entire world should
have intervened against the Zionists for committing such a crime against
humanity. Having lived under Turkish and then Western occupation, the Arab
countries had no significant military forces. The Zionists, on the other hand,
had been preparing for war for decades and were well funded, equipped and
trained. Outnumbering all Arab soldiers by three to one, they proceeded to
terrorize the Palestinian population, forcing 750,000 people
from their homes and enlarging their state far beyond the UN Mandate. They
shelled towns and villages and committed many massacres of civilians including
woman and children. Mass killings like the one at Deir Yassin frightened many
Palestinians into running away when they knew that the Jews were coming for
them.
The
Zionists were able to steal 78% of Palestine. 200,000 refugees from Jaffa and
towns and villages south of Jaffa fled to Gaza where their children are now
imprisoned as terrorists who want to destroy Israel . The 1948 U.N. Resolution
194 concerning Israel and the Palestinians, Article 11 Resolves that the
refugees wishing to return to their homes and live at peace with their
neighbors should be permitted to do so at the earliest practicable date, and
that compensation should be paid for the property of those choosing not to
return and for loss of or damage to property which, under principles of
international law or in equity, should be made good by the Governments or
authorities responsible. This Resolution was accepted by Israel as a condition
of statehood, but was then ignored. The excuse that refugees left voluntarily
is belied by the fact that all refugees who tried to return to their homes were
shot. Over 400 Palestinian villages were bulldozed to prevent refugees from
returning, and to clear land to build houses for Jews. Israel now exists in violation of the very UN resolution that
created it. Israel is both an illegal and an immoral state. The
establishment of Israel was a crime against all non-Jews in Palestine and the
persistence of this racist state is an offense to morality and international
law. It has, and continues to distort and destabilize all international
relations.
So
Britain and the United States carried out their promise to the Jews, but
completely failed to honor their pledge to protect the rights of
"Christians and all other non-Jewish communities in Palestine. The Arabs
tried to get the International Court of Justice to rule on the right of the UN
to partition a country against the will of its people but were voted down so
much for Western promises and Arab rights, then as today. Today, over 80 years
later, the West is still waging war against the non-Jewish people of Palestine
and of the entire region. In some cases, oil has been a prime motivation also,
as when the secular/nationalist government of Prime Minister Mossadeq in Iran
nationalized the oil industry (stopped the British from stealing Iran's oil).
At the request of the British, the CIA instituted a coup and reinstalled the
Shah. His illegitimate rule was marked by exploitation and abuse, eventually
resulting in an Islamic revolution.
To weaken
Islamic Iran (because it was not under US control), the US called upon their
man in Baghdad, Saddam Hussein. He had also been put into power with the help
of the CIA. In 1979, the US gave him the green light to attack Iran, who
was holding Americans hostage. The American client regimes in the region,
especially the monarchies of Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, were afraid of Iran, they
feared that its revolution would spread to their own countries. So with
their support and US support, Saddam waged a pointless, horrible war against
Iran. One million people were killed or wounded. America fed arms
and money to Saddam throughout the war. America supported Saddam even after he
gassed his own Kurdish citizens. He was a ruthless dictator and
warmonger, but he was our man.
The West
s complete neglect of the independence and freedom of the Arabs peoples has
produced deep resentment, as it must have done. To
contain this resentment, the Western world created and supported dictators in
most of the countries of the region. These client governments have
the task of allowing American and Western exploitation of their resources while
keeping their masses quiet suppressing their justified anger at the
American/Israeli ethnic cleansing of Palestine and the mass murder and
destruction in Iraq. The Arabs and other Muslims of
the region have known no democracy because, from the end of WWI, we haven t let
them have democracy because democracy for them went against our interests. Constant
war in the region has prevented normal economic and political
development.
The state
of Israel, criminal as it was, may have been able to live in peace with the
surrounding countries. However, the Israelis were not content with only part of
ancient Greater Israel. They wanted it all as per their religion. So in 1967,
through a series of calculated provocations, they pushed the Egyptian leader
Nassar into a show of resolve. They used his expulsion of the UN from the Sinai
as a pretext to take over more territory. Israel
was not attacked and was not going to be attacked in 1967. (This is
well-documented in The Iron Wall by Avi Shlaim.) Israel attacked and grabbed
the Golan Heights from Syria, the West Bank from Jordan, and the Sinai from
Egypt. Another 750,000 Palestinians (gentiles) were expelled from the lands
that Israel coveted. UN Security Council Resolution 242 decried the taking of
land by force, and demanded that Israel return to the pre-1967 boundaries. This
resolution was ignored, and the Israeli occupation remained illegal. Sadat
offered a separate peace with Israel under generous terms in 1971 if only
Israel would leave the Sinai. Israel refused and built more settlements there.
Sadat knew the Israelis understood only one language, so in 1973 he attacked
the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) in the Sinai with the limited purpose of
forcing Israel to withdraw. It worked.
Beginning
in 1973, the Palestinians and the Arab governments, knowing they could not
defeat Israel militarily, offered peace in exchange for Israeli withdrawal to
the pre-1967 borders. When the PLO accepted a two-state solution in the mid
1970s, and UN resolutions demanded its implementation, Israel responded to this
peace offensive by invading Lebanon in 1982 with the purpose of destroying the
PLO. Israel killed 20,000 Palestinians and Lebanese people, mostly civilians
just to avoid having to relinquish the West Bank and Golan Heights. Only by
maintaining a state of constant warfare
can Israel continue to justify its crimes. By 1988, the Palestinians realized
that there was going to be no international salvation for them. They started
the largely non-violent Intifada I. Israel responded with brutal repression but
the first Intifida stimulated the talks that led to the Oslo accords. In Oslo,
Israel tried to legitimize its apartheid model for dealing with the unwanted
Palestinians. It offered the corrupt Arafat and his cronies all the perks of
statehood if they would agree to run an orderly bantustan state-within-a-state.
Israel promised the Palestinians that they would eventually have a state based
on 242, but instead used the cover of the Oslo accords to double the
settlement population in the West Bank, from 200,000 to 400,000.
The
Palestinians, initially hopeful for peace and a state in the 67 borders,
eventually realized that Oslo was just another Israeli ruse intended to forever
deny them their basic human rights and forever imprison them in
Israeli-controlled ghettos. In 2000, Barak s "generous
offer" didn t meet the minimum requirements for a viable Palestinian
state. To make matters worse, the Israelis elected the psychopath and war
criminal, Ariel Sharon, who had purposefully triggered the second Intifada, to
suppress Intifida II with greater violence. The Saudi offer of normalization of
relations between all Arab states and Israel of 2002, which added new
concessions to UN Resolution 242, was ignored by the US and Israel. Indeed
Israel responded with more targeted assassinations in order to inflame the
situation and stop another Arab peace offensive . When Palestinian terrorist
groups, in consultation with European diplomats, decided suspend their attacks
within Israel, Ariel Sharon responded by dropping a one-ton bomb in a densely
populated neighborhood of Gaza, killing 16 adults and 9 children.
Every Arab country and every
Palestinian group, including Hamas, has said that it will accept the existence
of Israel, even as a racist Jewish state, if it will completely withdraw from
the West Bank, East Jerusalem, Gaza, and the Golan and come to terms with the
refugee problem it created. This is, after all, what UN Security Council Resolution 242 requires.
However, that is precisely the outcome that Israel has been fighting to avoid
for the last 35 years. Whenever the pressure to withdraw becomes too great, the
Israelis strike out at the Palestinians or surrounding countries, thus assuring
that a state of war continues to exist. The Arab League has repeated its call
for a withdrawal to the 1967 borders in exchange for peace and full diplomatic
relations. But like all peace proposals to
Israel, it has been swept aside. Israel wants land, not peace. In
fact, Israel has never withdrawn from any land it conquered until forced to
do so by violent opposition. It has also become abundantly clear that
Israel does not want to surrender any significant amount of land it holds for
the creation of a viable Palestinian state. It says that it does, as it must,
but its actions on the ground show that it does not.
Contrary
to popular mythology, it has been Israel, not the Arabs, that has evaded all
attempts at a peaceful and just settlement, preferring always to expand its
boundaries by creating facts on the ground and grinding down the Palestinians
and other Arabs until they will agree to its terms. Israel continues, on a daily basis, to talk about peace negotiations
while building settlements between Palestinian communities in the West Bank and
using all violent means that are politically feasible to drive the Palestinians
out. The international community, bullied by the U.S., sits by silently as
one of the century's most horrific episodes of ethnic cleansing continues with
an unparalleled military occupation that imprisons millions of Palestinians in
a violent racist nightmare. The hysterical pro-Israeli propaganda that assaults
Americans from their televisions and newspapers is a necessary part of the
cover-up of this ongoing crime against humanity. Fanatical Islam, slow to
develop at first, is an understandable reaction to fanatical Zionism and its
pitiless, unending victimization of the Palestinians and surrounding Arab
countries.
Abandoned
and abused by the so-called secular Western world, downtrodden people turn to
religion. The Arab people, Christian and Muslim, became progressively more
humiliated and angry as, with every passing year, the United States continued
to support Israeli ethnic cleansing, expansionism, and occupation. The U.S. has
used its diplomatic strength in the UN to veto every attempt by the rest of the
world to reign in the Israeli state. The U.S. gave, and still gives Arabs the
message that they are sub-human creatures who must submit to Israeli/American
power, surrendering their rights.
Against
its own best interests, America has
chosen war and has made Israel what it is a shameless, belligerent, racist
state of the kind not generally accepted in this day and age. Just imagine the reaction if certain groups in America
got their way, declared our country to be a Christian state, and killed or
expelled most non-Christians? Of course, you ve been told over and
over that Israel is a democracy and therefore worthy of our support. Think
about this and do some research. Is killing or expelling the undesirable
majority of non-Jews to create a majority of Jews any way to found a democracy?
Do you know the odds of a non-Jew immigrating to Israel? Zero. Yet
any Jew from anywhere in the world can become a citizen in Israel. In fact, the
state of Israel has a law specifying that the non-Jewish population of
Israel must never be more than a certain percentage! Arab citizens of Israel can vote, but they
do not have full citizenship rights.
Take a
look at the gross double standard that exists for Jews vs. non-Jews within the state of Israel. Non-Jews
are not allowed to buy any property from Jews as this would return
"redeemed" land back to the goyim. Seventy thousand non-Jews
live in 100 villages within Israel but not recognized by the Israeli
state. They pay taxes but get no services, and all building is illegal.
Non-Jewish citizens of Israel are not allowed to live in many areas of
Israel. Non-Jews are segregated for schooling, in schools with far
inferior funding. Non-Jews have to adhere to a great number of Jewish
religious laws. Non-Jews must all carry cards specifying their
religion and ethnic origin. Everywhere you look in Israeli law
and society you find this double standard. This is the democracy we re
supposed to love and support? Israel is an apartheid state based upon religious racism. Lastly, Israel's
military occupation of the West Bank and Gaza effectively makes these
areas part of the Israeli state. The difference in the treatment afforded to
Jews (settlers) and non-Jews in these areas hardly needs to be mentioned.
Settlers are allowed to steal land, harass and even kill gentiles.
If we
instead consider the West Bank as occupied territory instead of a part of the
Jewish state, then we have the fact that the Israelis are violating nearly every rule in the Geneva Convention
concerning the treatment of civilians in occupied territories! To believe that this racist and criminal state is OK
because it is a democracy is not only wrong, but dangerous.
Shouldn t we demand that Israel outlaw racism and discrimination? Shouldn t we
shudder with memories of Nazi Germany and Apartheid South Africa when we hear
Israelis invoking the need to maintain the Jewish character of the state of
Israel? It is clearly dishonest,
prejudicial, and futile to expect the Palestinians to stop attacking Israelis
and negotiate a peace with Israel when Israel occupies all Palestinian land,
exercises complete control over them, and offers them no hope that it will
allow them to have a viable state. Morally, this is
tantamount to demanding that concentration camp inmates stop attacking their
guards, give up their makeshift weapons, and negotiate a peace that requires
them to ignore the past, surrender their rights, and agree to stay forever in
the camp. Israel has no right to defend itself as long as it continues to
violate the rights of all non-Jews in Palestine. It has the obligation
to extend to all non-Jews in Palestine the very same rights as Jews, and to
offer all refugees the right to return to their homes and/or receive
appropriate compensation.
The only moral, permanent solution is for the all the human
beings currently living in Palestine is to form a multi-ethnic,
multi-religious, multi-lingual state with a new constitution. This was, in fact,
been the stated goal of the secular PLO all along, and even some Zionist
Israelis are now calling for this. Isn't such a state the generally avowed aim of the U.S. and
U.N. in all other regions of the world? The two-state solution has long been dead, killed by Israeli actions on
the ground. The one-state solution would not require the evacuation and
movement of all settlers from the West Bank. It would allow Jews to live in a
state encompassing most of what they consider their historic home. It would
solve the many internal tensions in Israel between the orthodox and secular
Jews, between the Ashkenazi, the Sephardim, and the Russians. It would finally
eliminate the state of war between Jews and all gentiles.
It’s so
simple. Instead of creating a second state, simply remove the Green Line that separates the West Bank from the rest
of Israel/Palestine. Give Jews, Christians and Muslims all
human beings equal rights before the law in a non-racist secular state. Offer
citizenship to all Palestinian refugees. Return all property to its rightful
owners or compensate them appropriately there would certainly be
sufficient funds available to do this. Write a new constitution to create a
liberal democratic state with no government intervention in religion or
education.
Hold
Truth and Reconciliation hearings as was done in South Africa. Let the healing
commence. Non-Jews would certainly constitute the majority in this state, but
that itself is not a problem for Jews IF the constitution fully protects
individual rights. What to call this new state? Let them negotiate
it. An Israeli has suggested Holyland. It
could be called Israel, but I think it should keep its traditional
non-racial, non-religious name of Palestine. Jews would stop being, and stop seeing themselves as
a special tribe/nation/race, under constant attack (from those it has wronged).
The
Israeli-Palestinian Conflict has produced and continues to produce far-reaching
repercussions. It has involved the entire world in a never-ending nightmare. By our violent
actions against the Arab/Muslim world we in the West have created a huge
reservoir of anger against Israel and its $5+ billion/year Sugar Daddy, America.
Zionism and
American racism in the Middle East have created an understandable counter
reaction radical and militant Islam. By waging unjust war against them, we have made
them turn away from Western values and have driven them back into the arms of
their religion. We have given them good reason to believe that the West
and all its values are corrupt and must be destroyed! The Arab/Muslim
people have never been militarily capable of winning any war against America or
Israel, and its own governments are mostly paid US clients. They have had
no choice but to resort to guerilla warfare and terrorism.
Look at the corruption of language that comes with war. We the dominant
powers with our great armies, air forces, and navies, can brand anyone who
attacks us as terrorists. When our military kills civilians by the
thousands, terrorizes millions, and destroys the infrastructure of non-Western,
non-Jewish people on a grand scale, that’s not
terrorism, but just collateral damage.
Saddam
Hussein was lured, by his master the US, into invading Kuwait in 1991 so
that US would destroy Iraq s military hardware which was a threat to Israel,
not to the US. The escalation of the Ninth Crusade, the so-called War on
Terrorism , was planned in Tel Aviv and Washington. (See A
Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm). It called for using
naked military force to terrorize the gentiles of the region and eliminate all
military resistance to Israeli hegemony in the region. American
Jews, non-Jewish Zionists, and US imperialists joined this strategy,
forming a group called Project for a New American Century. In their planning
document Rebuilding America s
Defenses , they laid out their plans for US domination of the world;
calling for a new Pearl Harbor (p. 51) to help them implement their plan.
Indeed, they created such an event. Elements in the Israeli and US Governments
(The Mossad, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Silverstein and others) planned and
executed the 9/11
attacks, thereby recruiting the US into Israel s war against all the people
of the Middle East. ( Your
problems are our problems. The Palestinians are your problem ).
WTC
buildings 1, 2, and 7 were all brought
down by controlled demolition, and neither does any other part of the
official government story fit the facts. 9/11 was used to implement the already-prepared Homeland Security
provisions outlined by PNAC. American
was turned into a police state. Torture, eavesdropping, and
extra-judicial assassination became official US policies for the first time. The
basic human rights of non-Americans and even of American citizens were
trampled. Cheney/Wolfowitz/Rumsfeld and prominent Jews Christopher Hitchens and
Richard Perle used 9/11 to convince the ignorant US President George W. Bush to
invade Iraq based upon Israeli-fabricated intelligence --lies and
propaganda. This war of aggression was intended to eliminate one impediment to
Israeli military domination of the region and firmly ensconcing the US in the Middle East as Israel s henchman.
The
American military, long indoctrinated with pro-Israeli propaganda, was trained
by Israeli officers to adopt Israeli terror tactics in its occupations of
Afghanistan and Iraq. The occupiers purposefully created a Sunni-Shia civil war
in Iraq, as per the long-range
Israeli Yinon plan to create internal chaos and to fragment the countries
of the region. 9/11 was also used to create the eternal, undefeatable enemy
Islamic terrorism. The resemblance of Bin Laden to Goldstein in Huxley's 1984
is uncanny. Purported videos and statements from Osama Bin Laden (i.e.
Goldstein) (who
denied any involvement in 9/11) were produced by Israeli intelligence
services whenever needed to affect US and world opinion.
Post
9/11, Israel can now claim that all its crimes against the Palestinian people
are part of a larger war against "Islamic Terrorism", giving Israel
free reign to commit more crimes against the gentiles in the region, as
witnessed in the horrific bombing of Lebanon in 2006 and its criminal blockade
and mass-murder in Gaza refugee camp. Iran is the next planned victim and any
and all means are being used to justify an Israeli or US attack on Iran s
nuclear facilities, leadership, and civilian infrastructure. This attack,
if it is to occur, will most likely be preceded by another false-flag operation like 9/11. America has been fully
"Israelized". It is no longer America. Most of the essential
provisions of the American Bill of Rights have been trampled, and more
will go. Its constitution and tradition have been nullified. The damage done to
the US’ s form of governance, international reputation and economy are all
irreversible.
The Ninth
Crusade has been a disaster for the Palestinians, Jews and for all the
people of the Middle East. It has also been a disaster for the citizens of
the U.S. who have lost their freedoms and seen their government lie, torture,
invade, destroy, and murder--for Israel and a dying US Empire.